Veterinary Receptionist Skills Assessment, Nebraska Driving Curfew, Abandoned Places In Wilmington, Nc, How To Add More Clips To Tiktok Draft, Pine County Most Wanted, Articles U

The Agency did not make a good-faith effort to accommodate Complainant's request not to work on Sundays where supervisor did not explore any type of accommodation and there was no indication whether it would be feasible to ask other employees to volunteer to work on Sundays. Iliana S. v. U.S. March 1, 2023 12:32 pm. Record was insufficient to determine whether Agency jointly employed Complainant where record did not contain the contract between the Agency and staffing firm, Complainant's position description, or any evidence regarding the day-to-day actions, duties, and responsibilities of Complainant's job. 0120180739 (June 21, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180739.pdf. %%EOF info@eeoc.gov USPS' average processing time for all complaint closures increased from 238 days in FY 2008 to 243 days in FY 2009. But these new rules would impose additional requirements on the EEOC that . A lock ( information only on official, secure websites. It is not an effective accommodation to require an employee with a disability to take leave when another accommodation would enable the employee to continue working, and it is not the agency's role to dictate what type of assistive or monitoring device the employee uses. Foster B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. Based on Title VII charges alone, the EEOC collected $234,000,000 in monetary benefits in 2020. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's finding that Agency discriminated against Complainant on the bases of race (African American) and sex (male) when it terminated his employment for alleged insubordination and misconduct; AJ found that evidence substantiated Complainant's perception that supervisor regarded him as a "big, Black man" and racially stereotyped his behavior as aggressive and intimidating. The complainant worked at the United States Postal Service (USPS). Harriet M. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Of the 5,659 complaints filed at USPS, 1,283 contained allegations of race (Black/African American) discrimination, 570 contained allegations of race (White) discrimination, 128 contained allegations of race (Asian) discrimination, 17 contained allegations of race (American Indian/Alaska Native) discrimination, 757 contained allegations of color discrimination and 2,533 contained allegations of disability discrimination. 1 min read. Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. The Administrative Judge properly awarded Complainant $3,000.00 in nonpecuniary compensatory damages where Complainant offered corroborative testimony from his family, friends, and colleagues; the AJ found that Complainant's testimony was not credible in some respects but was credible with respect to how the discrimination affected his family and work life; and the amount awarded was consistent with amounts awarded under similar circumstances. According to the Commission, there was evidence of at least five incidents over a one year period where the agency failed to accommodate complainant's hearing impairment. EEOC Awards $165,000 in Compensatory Damages The EEOC recently awarded $165,000 in non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering to an employee of the U.S. On September 1, 2022 Arbitrator Joseph M. Sharnoff issued his latest national-level RI-399 award, this one concerning the Automated Delivery Unit Sorter (ADUS). Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit, nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com, Syracuse NY Postal Carrier Charged with Discarding Mail, Kubayanda Resumes Role as Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman, Florida Postal Clerk Sentenced To Prison For Stealing Mail, Passport Applications To Commit Bank Fraud, Nebraska man gets prison for impersonating USPS Postal Inspector, U.S. o o o o O o o O o tri 6 > CD o O o e o o o o o o o Q o o o O o o o o O o You benefit from having control of the process, since you authorize access to your information. The lawsuit also alleges that workers were fired after being moved to less physically demanding jobs, even if they provided written instructions to human resources from medical professionals restricting the type of work they were able to safely perform with their conditions. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) offers three ways to voluntarily resolve charges: mediation, settlement and conciliation. An official website of the United States government. 2019005824 (Dec. 7. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY) 0120160543 (Jan. 14, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/0120160543.pdf. The Cost to your Company. 2019002523 (July 7, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_11/2019002523.pdf. 15, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2019005957.pdf. 2020002082 (Sept. 15, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_19/2020002082.pdf. The Commission lacks jurisdiction to consider appeals from Peace Corps volunteers and applicants, who have a separate EEO complaint process outside Commission jurisdiction; although Complainant filed her complaint against the State Department, it concerned a Peace Corps volunteer position over which the Commission did not have jurisdiction. Complainant not entitled to award of Thrift Savings Plan reimbursements where there was no evidence that she participated in the program. Sharon M. v. Dep't of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. Ruben T. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 2019003996 (May 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2019003996.pdf. The complainants own testimony, along with the circumstances of a particular case, can suffice to sustain his burden in this regard. Herschel T. v. National Aeronautics and Space Admin., EEOC Appeal No. 0720170019 (Aug. 3, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720170019.txt. USPS expended a total of $4,541,324 for 3,014 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $1,507. In addition to discrimination charges, in fiscal year 2020, the EEOC resolved 165 lawsuits and filed an additional 93 lawsuits. Official websites use .gov NEW YORK (AP) Four New York City ambulance workers who said they were disciplined for speaking to the media during the harrowing, early months of the COVID-19 pandemic have reached a settlement in their free speech lawsuit against the fire department and the city, their union announced Wednesday. Sol W. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. Agency discriminated against Complainant on the bases of race and sex when her supervisor gave her a negative job reference that included unfounded critical statements about Complainant; evidence supported Complainant's assertion that supervisor did not want Complainant, a Hispanic woman, potentially to serve as the supervisor's superior. 20, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171870.pdf. USPS agreed to pay a total of $5,631,795 plus other benefits for 598 complaint closures through settlement agreements, final agency decisions, and final agency orders fully implementing AJ decisions. Administrative Judge properly ordered Agency to stop issuing cease-and-desist letters to employees who have reported discrimination, absent clear, documented evidence of some conduct (other than reporting discrimination) that the Agency reasonably concludes would warrant discipline in the absence of the employee's protected activity; issuing Complainant a cease-and-desist letter gave the appearance that Complainant, who complained of ongoing racial and sexual harassment, was just as culpable as her harasser. Particularly useful are their publications "Questions and Answers About . Washington, DC 20507 Speaking of Special Interest Groups it is pathetic. 2020001922 (May 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020001922.pdf. Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed. 0120180917 (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180917.pdf. The United States Postal Service (USPS) has fired or forced out nearly 44,000 employees who were injured on the job since 2006 through its National Reassessment Process (NRP), according to a. However, some of the funds were held back to ensure that all affected clerks would receive back pay. 0120182095 (June 23, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/0120182095.pdf. 2019001468 (June 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019001468.pdf. EEOC finds that a USPS employee claims of discrimination and retaliation were not sufficiently investigated by the agency. 0120141484 (Jan. 30, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120141484.txt. Irvin M. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 2020000974 (Feb. 11, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/2020000974.pdf. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that Complainant, who held a GS-14 position, did not establish that her work was substantially equal to that of GS-15 male employees; Complainant did not have the same responsibilities as her comparators because she was not a supervisor, did not have budget authority, did not speak for the Agency the way higher-level employees did, and did not have the technical expertise of higher-level employees. The Administrative Judge properly reduced Complainant's attorney's fees and costs by 40 percent where Complainant prevailed on only one of his five retaliation claims, the successful claim was not so inextricably intertwined with the unsuccessful claims that Complainant would be entitled to an award of full attorney's fees, the case did not present novel issues, and the fee petition contained numerous instances that might be considered excessive, duplicative, or unreasonable time expended. An official website of the United States government. Jennifer K. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC recently awarded $165,000 in non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering to an employee of the U.S. Kirk J. Angel is an employment attorney representing federal employees. Neither did the unions make any effort to unite USPS workers with their class brothers and sisters across the border during the 2018 strike of 50,000 Canadian postal workers, who were also fighting against a brutal profit-driven work regimen where real wages had fallen and understaffing led to speedup and heavy workloads that caused an accident rate among postal workers to be five times that of the average rate for federally regulated industries. The government-wide average was 344 days. The claims, evidence, and legal briefs for all of our clients' relief claims have been submitted to the EEOC Administrative Judge. After an appeal, complainant later requested the EEOC reopen her case. Agency's final order adopting Administrative Judge's decision vacated, and case remanded to Agency for reissuance of final order, where Complainant did not receive the AJ's decision and therefore was unable to argue with specificity about the AJ's findings and conclusions that the Agency implemented. 14, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2020005108.pdf. In these districts, the Postal Inspection Service investigated 145 . 0120161068 (Mar. USPS' average time for completing an investigation was 113 days. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC noted that the untimely invoices submitted on appeal did not detail the attorneys hourly rate or clearly identify the services performed by the attorney. USPS Worker Arrested - Retaliation Goes Too Far. What Hasn't Been Working Well Imagine the EEOC ruling against you in a discrimination charge and inviting you to a settlement conference without explaining either why you lost the case or how [] The settlement directed the Postal Service to pay $44.8 million directly to clerks and establish an escrow of $11.2 million to be disbursed in a manner determined by the union. 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171406.pdf. Welcome to the USPS Class Action Claim Website This website is intended for the sole use of claimants and their attorneys/representatives in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission class action involving the NRP and allegations of discrimination (Velva B, et al. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. In 2021, we reported that non-career employees' turnover and injury rates were higher than career rates, both before and after we controlled for numerous factors such as employee tenure. Requiring Complainant to seek assistance in opening doors from security guards and coworkers did not provide her with an effective accommodation; Agency's eventual installation of automatic doors demonstrated that this accommodation was not an undue hardship. When determining an award of non-pecuniary compensatory damages, the Commission may consider the present-day value of comparable awards. Irina T. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Cox will be seeking the right to file suit regarding this last EEO complaint and at such time will amend her lawsuit. Bill A. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120122795 (Feb. 23, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120122795.txt. Lara G. v. United States Postal Service https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0520130618.txt. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) administrative judge may suspend a hearing to allow the parties to settle a case and will accept a settlement to resolve the case at any time before a final decision is reached. Agency did not meet its burden to show that the disparity between Complainant's pay and that of two male general surgeons was based on a factor other than sex where Agency provided only vague statements to justify the pay differential and there was a lack of information reflecting how the salaries of Complainant and the comparators were set. 1-844-234-5122 (ASL Video Phone), Call 1-800-669-4000 If such draconian moves ever go forward, it will only be thanks to the previous Democratic and Republican administrations which sanctioned cuts to the USPS and to the postal workers unions which have been complicit in these attacks. Sherrill S. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Petition No. Share sensitive Official websites use .gov 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_04_05/2019005824%20DEC.pdf. Agency did not take prompt corrective action, and therefore did not meet its affirmative defense to harassment, when it took six months to engage in an internal investigation and issue a proposed 30-day suspension to the coworker who had sent Complainant a threatening email containing a racial slur. 520-2008-00053X; Agency Case No. Agency subjected Complainant to a retaliatory hostile work environment when, during a conversation in which Complainant asked her supervisor to investigate her allegations of race discrimination, the supervisor reminded Complainant that she was still in a probationary status, denied that the Agency was discriminating, told Complainant "to calm down on that," and stated that Complainant's co-workers might file complaints against her because they found her claims of race discrimination offensive. 2019005682 (Apr. Elden R. v. Dep't of the Interior, EEOC Appeal No. She alleged the USPS had not complied with the EEOC order. To help the public identify those decisions, the Commission has decided to assign randomly generated first names and initials, along with a brief summary of the decisions, to the cases. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. For our clients, please provide your updated contact information to us. information only on official, secure websites. That class action complaint, covering all injured-on-duty employees who were reassessed under the NRP during the period 5/5/06 through 7/1/11, was decided by the EEOC in September 2017 and finalized in a March 9, 2018 decision. On December 8, 2017, Arbitrator Shyam Das found that the Postal Service was in violation of the parties Article 1.6.B Global Settlement Remedy (This article first appeared in the July/August 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) The EEOC recognizes this crisis affects all federal employees, complainants, and others involved in the EEO process. 2019003663 (Aug. 22, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019003663.pdf. Complainant's request for default judgment granted where Agency began its investigation only after Complainant requested a hearing before an Administrative Judge and provided no explanation for its failure to investigate complaint in a timely manner; because the record did not establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment, a claim of harassment, or a prima facie case of compensation discrimination, Complainant was not entitled to individual relief. 3, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180568.pdf. USPS employee wins discrimination and harassment claim with the EEOC. Sherrie M. v. U.S. Agency discriminated against Complainant based on disability when it denied her request for leave without pay and charged her with being absent without leave; agencies may need to modify general leave policies when providing reasonable accommodations. usps eeoc settlements 2020 usps eeoc settlements 2020. ps4 controller trigger keeps activating. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Although Petitioner was entitled to back pay as a component of make-whole relief, she was not entitled to a sum greater than what she would have earned but for her constructive discharge; because her earnings while in active-duty military service between the time of her constructive discharge and her reinstatement exceeded her gross civilian back pay, Petitioner was not entitled to receive back pay. Latarsha A. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, EEOC Appeal Nos. Wilfredo M. v. Dep't of Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. This means a settlement from the EEOC or business is not accepted and the victim decides to take the matter to court. LockA locked padlock 0520130618 (June 9, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0520130618.txt. XOs`4ueYh;Ex=B,Dv4 RhA8eKw/VAFGVg(Iz8u.V:\Ms|(pAGn%A@%xK b8@8\Kx78 Y> &L P dv0H4t0p40Ht00 @` h*D#8&i 4 a`M@, 0120180519 (Mar. 22, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2020001154.pdf. Washington DC 20005. The program sought to significantly cut labor costs for USPS, which faced increasing operating costs from fuel price increases, decreasing revenue from reductions in the use of priority services like first-class mail, as well as increasing competition for the delivery of packages and urgent mail from giant logistics corporations like UPS and FedEx. Compensatory damages are not available in retaliation complaints arising solely out of prior EEO activity related to the ADEA. Miguelina S. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Request No. Heidi B. v. Dep't of Health and Human Services, EEOC Appeal No. Complainant was entitled to an award of $25,000.00 in nonpecuniary compensatory damages where he demonstrated that, because of the Agency's conduct, he endured emotional distress which affected not only him but his family relationships and that, due to his inability to gain employment, his depression worsened and he was unable to afford healthcare for treatment. 0120152431 (Nov. 29, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120152431.pdf. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 3, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180137.pdf. 131 M Street, NE *Includes only complaints filed in FY 2009 where counseling was also completed during FY 2009. This represents a decrease of 482 employees from FY 2008 and a decrease of 794 employees since FY 2005. The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Reprisal; (2) Disability (Physical); and (3) Age. 20, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170604.pdf. death spawn osrs. 0720160021 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720160021.txt. 0720180015 (Nov. 15, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180015.pdf. During the coming weeks, we will not only be analyzing the spreadsheet for the Agency's compliance with the Judge's Order, but we will also be supplementing the spreadsheet with the information the EEOC has asked us to compile. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. The Judge has not yet made clear exactly how she plans to move forward with reviewing the information or issuing relief decisions. USPS' average processing time for all complaint closures increased from 238 days in FY 2008 to 243 days in FY 2009. Administrative Judge properly sanctioned Complainant, by cancelling the hearing and remanding the complaint to the Agency for a final decision, when Complainant failed to abide by the AJ's order to remove video depositions of management officials from YouTube and to provide written confirmation that he had done so. Interest on back pay is not available in federal-sector complaints under the ADEA. 0120171405 (Mar. 2020004360 and 2020004343 (Nov. 4, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020004360-2020004343.pdf. The US Postal Department had been a cabinet department of the executive branch since 1872. If you are a federal employee or a USPS employee, you can set a consultation via our website at: http://www.theangellawfirm.com You can get a free consultation (15 minutes) or paid consultation for upto a full one hour. Barbara S. v. U.S. 0120150846 (Nov. 10, 2016), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120150846.txt. The Administrative Judge erred when, in the absence of an order, he sanctioned the Agency for its failure to complete the EEO investigation in a timely manner by issuing a default judgment in favor of Complainant. Carroll R. v. Dep't of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when it did not provide Complainant with adequate equipment and unreasonably delayed the provision of assistive technology, software, and training to support her accommodation of full-time telework; performance counseling memorandum and placement on performance improvement plan for performance issues directly resulted from Agency's failure to provide Complainant with adequate technologies required to telework effectively. For our 2021 report, we analyzed USPS data from fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to determine turnover and injury rates. Class members include individuals with disabilities in permanent rehabilitation positions who allegedly had their duty hours restricted between March 24, 2000 and December 31, 2012. Cristen T. v. U.S. Login to EEO efile This is the on-line system for initiating the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) counseling process or the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process with an EEO Counselor to resolve your claim of employment discrimination. Published: July 20, 2016. Labor costs made up 80 percent of the USPS operating costs at the time that the NRP was rolled out. 0120150799 (Feb. 16, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_16/0120150799.pdf. Will K. v. U.S. 0120180641 (Aug. 6, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/0120180641.pdf. Velva B. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 529 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1FB7EE72CCD9854B90DCFC8A33497EB8><1B534663FC186A42AEFC8BA0152CE4CF>]/Index[511 26]/Info 510 0 R/Length 94/Prev 400457/Root 512 0 R/Size 537/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Please know that we are fighting for you, just as we have done for over 10 years. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff's favor when taken to litigation. No. Watch David Norths remarks commemorating 25 years of the World Socialist Web Site and donate today. The grievances expressed in the lawsuit are the result of the subordination of the US Postal Service to the relentless demands of the capitalist profit system in which it operates, and these conditions cannot be eliminated for all workers through the capitalist legal system. Permanent Workforce: 622,045 Temporary Workforce: 85,843 Total Workforce: 707,888. Padilla also averred that he was unable to afford to see a psychologist as he didnt have any medical insurance. This booklet also provides an explanation of the REDRESS program REDRESS, an alternative dispute resolution process, may offer you an opportunity to request mediation in addition to traditional EEO Joshua F. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120171406 (Mar. Your claim in this case is a personal asset. Silas T. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. Lois G. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. Although the Agency argued that there were "security reasons" for delaying the accommodation, it did not provide any details describing the concerns, it "lost track" of his request for approximately five months, and it failed to respond adequately to his request for a list of Agency-approved software. 1-800-669-6820 (TTY) 1-800-669-6820 (TTY) The EEOC found that $8,000.00 was an appropriate sum for damages based on three major factors. Supervisor engaged in per se reprisal when he told Complainant that her complaints about EEO issues were causing him extra work and stress, threatened her with termination, and labeled her as someone who does not work well with others because of her oral complaints about co-workers. v. United States Postal Service an AJ decision certified the following class: It has come to our attention that a number of people who were Class Members in the Pittman v. USPS class action have been receiving letters from USPS about that settlement process. Sang G. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. 0120182156 (Sept. 12, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182156.txt. Of the 3,014 completed investigations, 99.2% were timely. According to the US Labor Department, postal workers accounted for only one-fifth of all federal employees in 2019, yet were disproportionately injured on the job, experiencing half of all workplace illness and injuries among federal employees. endstream endobj 512 0 obj <. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 100 days. but I was working at a Post office in the same county in 2015. 0120162314 (June 5, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162314.txt. 0120170362 (Feb. 21, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170362.pdf. In 2009, an administrative judge awarded back pay with interest and $100,000 in compensatory damages. For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers: In either event, the complaint process will be suspended for 90 pending the outcome of the settlement discussions. The AJ took account of several factors that limited Complainants non-pecuniary damages award, found that the Agency was not the sole cause of Complainants emotional and psychological harm, and limited the award of pecuniary damages to the amounts contained in "legitimate receipts.". USPS has taken steps, and described . v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, EEOC . ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. Frequently Asked Questions, Commissioner Charges and Directed Investigations, Office of Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion, Management Directives & Federal Sector Guidance, Federal Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution, Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year, Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures, All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands). Many noteworthy federal appellate decisions are frequently used as a part of the Commission's outreach and training efforts. 0120180570, 0120181692, and 2019002121 (Sept. 4, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180570.pdf.